Whether you’re starting your first business, looking for a way to move your business online, or simply looking to trade in your current web host for a better one, choosing the right web hosting provider is critical to the success of your business.
If you’re looking for a user-friendly yet powerful solution, you’ve probably come across Bluehost and Hostinger before, and for all the right reasons. Both hosts have managed to remain beginner-friendly while offering a wide variety of hosting options, features, and apps available. However, although these hosts are similar, they are not quite the same.
That’s why we’re going to explore the similarities and differences between these hosts with a focus on features, ease of use, performance, customer support, and pricing.
So if you are still struggling to decide between Bluehost and Hostinger, stick with us. At the end of this comparison, you should have a clear idea which of these hosts is the right choice for you and your business.
Main similarities and differences
Although Hostinger and Bluehost are particularly popular choices, the latter has been around for nearly two decades, establishing itself as one of the biggest names in the web hosting industry and home to over two million domain names. .
Hostinger, on the other hand, started its journey as Hosting Media, rebranding itself as Hostinger in 2011, so while its history is a success story, it lacks Bluehost’s long track record.
Today, Bluehost is mostly popular for its WordPress-specific packages filled with professional features, while Hostinger emphasizes being as cheap and cheerful as possible without compromising overall performance.
Also, while both hosts offer great entry-level solutions aimed at newcomers, Bluehost is slightly stronger when it comes to customer support, so if that’s one of your top priorities, choose Bluehost.
If you don’t mind finding your way without a committed customer support staff available by phone line and you plan to rely on step-by-step guides, Hostinger might be a better bet.
Since entry-level shared hosting plans are pretty much the most popular choice for users just starting out, let’s start with that. Bluehost currently offers four shared hosting packages, while Hostinger offers three – and both come with add-ons and some customizations that can be requested.
The most economical choice with Bluehost is a shared hosting plan called “Basic” and for $2.74 (€2.64) per month (on annual billing) it will get you a single site, 50 GB of SSD storage , custom WordPress themes, a free domain for a year, and 24/7 customer support.
On the downside, only two billing cycles are available (every 12 or every 36 months), so if you were hoping to get a monthly plan, you’re out of luck. Also, after the promotional period ends, the significant price spike might catch you off guard – that’s a hefty $9.25 (€8.92) per month.
With Hostinger you can get one site, 30GB SSD storage, up to 10,000 visits per month, one email account, two databases, two subdomains, free SSL certificate, DNS firewall Cloudflare and 24/7/365 customer support for $3.49 (€3.35) per month (on annual billing).
However, if you commit to four years, you can reduce the cost to $1.99 (€1.90), which is the most economical option here. Even with the end of the promotional period, the price will jump to $3.99 (€3.85) – significantly lower than Bluehost.
So, if you’re working on a tight budget, Hostinger might be a better choice than Bluehost, both in short-term and long-term planning. However, while these hosts differ slightly in terms of features, we score evenly when it comes to value for money.
Hosting Services Comparison
While Bluehost and Hostinger both offer shared hosting, WordPress-specific hosting (managed and unmanaged), VPS hosting, and e-commerce hosting, Hostinger also provides cloud hosting solutions, unlike Bluehost.
It’s also worth noting that with Hostinger you can get Windows VPS hosting, while with Bluehost it’s Linux or nothing. However, since Linux hosting is a more popular choice anyway, this won’t be a deal breaker for most, but those looking to use specific Windows applications will think otherwise.
Also, if you are planning to upgrade your business with a dedicated server, you will have to go with Bluehost, as Hostinger does not provide dedicated hosting.
Overall, although Hostinger offers a few more options, if you’re not interested in cloud or Windows hosting, it won’t matter much to you.
Website builder offer
For those who aren’t particularly tech-savvy or don’t have enough time to build their site from scratch, Bluehost and Hostinger offer easy-to-use website building services.
With Bluehost, you’ll get a beginner-friendly WordPress website builder that will make building a professional-looking WordPress site both quick and easy. It features an intuitive interface, drag and drop functionality, and tons of templates.
Hostinger’s sitebuilder of choice is Zyro and it covers all the essentials with over 200 mobile-friendly templates, easy drag-and-drop customizations, and the ability to attach videos, maps, social media widgets and basic e-commerce functionality.
If you want a budget-conscious solution, Zyro’s entry-level plans might be a perfect fit. On the other hand, if you are looking for a more scalable, customizable and long term solution, go for Bluehost.
If speed is what you need, Hostinger might be a better choice, especially if you plan to build a WordPress site. Indeed, Hostinger supports WordPress LiteSpeed module on its latest Linux cloud server platform to improve speed, stability, and uptime. Its hosting solutions also include an optional Cloudflare CDN which will not only boost speed but also protect the site from DDoS attacks.
As expected, Hostinger offers all of its users a 99.9% uptime guarantee, which is a bit low (we wanted to see at least 99.98%) but much better than not offering an uptime guarantee at all. , such as Bluehost.
Hostinger’s main data center is located in Kaunas (Lithuania), but it also has servers in Europe (UK, Netherlands and Lithuania), Asia (Singapore, India), North America (States States) and South America (Brazil) .
All Bluehost servers are located in the United States, with the main data center based in Orem (Utah, United States).
Ease of use and performance
Bluehost and Hostinger are easy to learn with an intuitive signup process, easy-to-use dashboard, convenient control panel, one-click installs, WordPress-friendly, and drag-and-drop approach. , site creation software.
While Bluehost opted to integrate the industry-leading, Linux-based cPanel, Hostinger offered its own control panel called hPanel – and surprise, surprise, it’s as user-friendly as cPanel.
When it comes to overall performance, although both hosts are quite powerful, due to the amount of server locations available, you can expect faster speed with Hostinger. However, if you and your target audience are from the United States, it’s a tie.
In terms of customer support, Bluehost has a better start than Hostinger thanks to providing more support channels for users to choose from.
These include phone support, 24/7 live chat, an FAQ section, and a knowledge base with easy-to-follow tutorials, video guides, and guidelines.
On the other hand, with Hostinger, you will get 24/7 live chat, email support, and a comprehensive knowledge base, but no phone support.
Both hosts have enthusiastically updated blogs where you’ll find tons of useful tips and tricks.
Which host wins?
While Bluehost and Hostinger have a lot to offer, both have their own strengths and weaknesses.
With Bluehost, you can expect a great user experience, excellent uptime, more resources (storage, bandwidth, and sites), a stronger focus on WordPress, and more support channels.
At the same time, Hostinger is more user-friendly than its competitor, especially with a long-term commitment. It also offers a wider variety of hosting services and more powerful performance backed by a 99.9% uptime guarantee.
Luckily, both hosts offer a 30-day money-back guarantee, which means you can try everything for yourself without blowing your budget.